Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Dipke-Ranka: Civil Society Doesn’t Come With a Government ID

The controversy involving Dipke and Ranka of the CJP is larger than an altercation over the attempted inspection of a government school. Beneath it lies a fundamental question of constitutional democracy: Can those who claim to speak for civil society also assume the powers of the State? There is nothing undemocratic about citizens questioning government. Parents can question a school's functioning, students can protest, teachers can complain and civil-society organisations can expose administrative failure. They can demand records, seek accountability, mobilise public opinion and approach courts. But democracy rests on a distinction that cannot be erased in the name of activism: the right to question authority is not the right to exercise authority. If citizens believe a government school is being badly administered, they can demand an inspection. They can seek information under the law, approach education officials, organise parents, protest peacefully or go to court. What they c...

Latest Posts

Vande Mataram Belongs to the Nation, Not to a Party

From Sardesai to Chidambaram: Who Really Qualifies as a Dimagi Naxal?

Batwara 1947 — Partition is not a balance sheet

Dipke, Saurav Das in the Dock: The Paper Trail They Must Explain

Jharkhand Didn’t Need a Political Script

Five Hundred Metres from Parliament, and Several Miles from Evidence

Where Is Amit Shah? Perhaps That Is the Wrong Question

The Voter Is Rebuilding the Opposition

Dear Zuckerberg, This Not About Modi, But Soverignty

Bankipur and Modi's doctrine: Why a known enemy may be better than an unknown one