The Mysterious Sonia

The cry for a ‘Free Kashmir’ has long been more than just a separatist slogan—it’s a dangerous narrative woven into the very fabric of India’s struggle against terrorism. What’s alarming, however, is how this narrative has been supported and even legitimized by powerful international actors and domestic political figures. The 1999 hijacking of Indian Airlines Flight IC 814 and the murky maneuvers surrounding it expose a disturbing truth: the push for an independent Kashmir isn’t just coming from terrorists but from influential players whose agendas remain hidden from public view.

A Suspicious Beginning: The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation and Global Connections

I’ve always been puzzled by the timeline of events following the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in 1991. Just a month after his death, the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation was established. This wasn’t just a tribute; it was a calculated move that quickly extended its influence beyond India’s borders. By 1993, the Foundation had established branches in the UK and US, with Sonia Gandhi at the helm. It’s not a coincidence that the same year, George Soros launched his Open Society Foundation in New York. Both organizations would go on to have overlapping interests, including the controversial ‘Free Kashmir’ agenda.

In 1994, the Forum of Democratic Leaders in the Asia-Pacific (FDL-AP) was formed, openly advocating for an independent Kashmir. Sonia Gandhi, as the co-president, was deeply involved, and the Soros Foundation was one of its main financial backers. It’s unsettling to think that a figure so central to Indian politics was linked to an organization pushing a separatist narrative that directly challenged India’s sovereignty.

The Kandahar Hijacking: A Turning Point in the Free Kashmir Plot

The 1999 hijacking of Flight IC 814 was not just a horrific act of terror but a strategic move in a broader geopolitical game. I was stunned to learn that when the hijacked plane landed in the UAE, the US ambassador was allowed access to the airport, while the Indian ambassador was denied entry. This wasn’t just a snub; it was a clear signal of whose interests were being prioritized. The hijackers initially demanded the release of 36 terrorists, including Masood Azhar, who went on to form Jaish-e-Mohammed, a group dedicated to the ‘Free Kashmir’ cause.

This event revealed a disturbing reality: international players, including those who claimed to be India’s allies, were complicit in manipulating the situation to serve their own strategic interests. The fact that Masood Azhar was frequently interviewed by the FBI during his time in Indian custody only adds to the suspicion that his release was more than a terrorist victory—it was part of a larger narrative being orchestrated by unseen hands.

Sonia Gandhi’s International Ties and Hidden Agendas

What’s even more troubling is the web of international connections involving key Indian political figures. Sonia Gandhi’s visits to the US and UK in the early 2000s, including closed-door meetings with powerful groups like the Council of Foreign Relations and figures like Henry Kissinger, raise serious questions. Who were these “very special” people she met, and what was discussed? The secrecy surrounding these visits fuels the suspicion that the ‘Free Kashmir’ narrative had backing from high places, far beyond India’s borders.

After the Congress party’s election victory in 2004, Sonia Gandhi formed the National Advisory Council (NAC), bringing on board figures like Harsh Mander and Arundhati Roy, known for their controversial views on Kashmir. Both had ties to Soros-funded organizations, further entangling the narrative of Kashmir’s independence with international agendas that often conflicted with India’s interests.

Compromise at the Cost of National Security

One of the most shocking revelations for me was the UPA government’s 2010 decision to release 25 terrorists, including Latif, as a goodwill gesture. This wasn’t a hostage situation; it was a dangerous compromise that had no justification. Latif would later resurface as the handler of the 2016 Pathankot attack, proving once again that the costs of these decisions are paid in blood.

What I find particularly disturbing is how consistently the ‘Free Kashmir’ narrative has been nurtured by political choices that seem to prioritize foreign appeasement over national security. Whether through repealing anti-terror laws like POTA or engaging with separatist sympathizers, these actions have emboldened those pushing for Kashmir’s independence.

A Battle Beyond Borders

The call for a ‘Free Kashmir’ is not just the rallying cry of terrorists—it’s a strategic narrative shaped in boardrooms, political forums, and international alliances. It’s unsettling to realize that some of the most influential actors driving this narrative are not only beyond our borders but also embedded within our political landscape. From the hijacking of IC 814 to the shady dealings of global NGOs, this battle is being fought on multiple fronts, often without the public’s knowledge.

India’s fight for Kashmir is not just a territorial dispute; it’s a struggle against a well-funded, politically backed narrative that seeks to undermine our sovereignty. The complicity of international players and domestic figures in promoting the ‘Free Kashmir’ agenda must be exposed and confronted head-on. The stakes are too high to ignore, and the lessons of the past remind us that compromise and silence are no longer options.

(Inputs from here)